Comparing induction of labour with oral misoprostol or Foley catheter at term: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled multi-centre non-inferiority trial-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparing induction of labour with oral misoprostol or Foley catheter at term: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled multi-centre non-inferiority trial

Published:2017-08-08 Issue:3 Volume:125 Page:375-383
ISSN:1470-0328
Container-title:BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
language:en
Short-container-title:BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy

Author:

ten Eikelder MLG¹,van Baaren G-J²,Oude Rengerink K³,Jozwiak M¹,de Leeuw JW⁴,Kleiverda G⁵,Evers I⁶,de Boer K⁷,Brons J⁸,Bloemenkamp KWM⁹,Mol BW¹⁰¹¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics; Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden; Leiden the Netherlands

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Academic Medical Centre; Amsterdam the Netherlands

3. Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care; Univerity Medical Center Utrecht; Utrecht the Netherlands

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Ikazia Hospital; Rotterdam the Netherlands

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Flevo Hospital; Almere the Netherlands

6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Meander Medical Centre; Amersfoort the Netherlands

7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Rijnstate Hospital; Arnhem the Netherlands

8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Medical Spectrum Twente; Enschede the Netherlands

9. Wilhelmina Children's Hospital Birth Centre; University Medical Centre Utrecht; Utrecht the Netherlands

10. The Robinson Research Institute; School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health; University of Adelaide; Adelaide SA Australia

11. South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute; Adelaide SA Australia

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.14706/fullpdf

Reference21 articles.

1. NICE guideline Induction of labour 2008 http://www.nice.org.uk/CG070

2. The Health and Social Care Information Centre NHS Maternity Statistics, England 2013-14 http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB16725/nhs-mate-eng-2013-14-summ-repo-rep.pdf

3. Immediate delivery versus expectant monitoring for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation (HYPITAT-II): an open-label, randomised controlled trial;Broekhuijsen;Lancet,2015

4. Elective delivery in diabetic pregnant women;Boulvain;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2001

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comparison of effectiveness of Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening in induction of labour in Gedeo zone public hospitals, Ethiopia, 2022. Quasi-experimental design;International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences;2024

2. Efficacy of pharmacological and mechanical cervical priming methods for induction of labour and their applicability for outpatient management: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials;European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology;2023-08

3. The 300 versus 300 Study—Low Volume versus High Volume Single Balloon Catheter for Induction of Labor: A Retrospective Case-Control Study;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2023-07-22

4. The efficacy and safety of 25 μg or 50 μg oral misoprostol versus 25 μg vaginal misoprostol given at 4‐ or 6‐hourly intervals for induction of labour in women at or beyond term with live singleton pregnancies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis;International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics;2023-07-03

5. Mechanical methods for induction of labour;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2023-03-30