Trends in caesarean section rates in Europe from 2015 to 2019 using Robson's Ten Group Classification System: A Euro‐Peristat study

Author:

Amyx Melissa1ORCID,Philibert Marianne1ORCID,Farr Alex2ORCID,Donati Serena3ORCID,Smárason Alexander K.4ORCID,Tica Vlad5ORCID,Velebil Petr67,Alexander Sophie8ORCID,Durox Mélanie1,Elorriaga Maria Fernandez9ORCID,Heller Günther10,Kyprianou Theopisti11,Mierzejewska Ewa12ORCID,Verdenik Ivan13,Zīle‐Velika Irisa14ORCID,Zeitlin Jennifer1ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Université de Paris Cité, Épidémiologie Obstétricale, Périnatale et Pédiatrique (EPOPé), Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistiques Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS), INSERM U1153, INRA Paris France

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Feto‐Maternal Medicine Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

3. National Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore di Sanità Italian Ministry of Health (ISS) Rome Italy

4. Institution of Health Science Research University of Akureyri Akureyri Iceland

5. Faculty of Medicine, East European Institute for Reproductive Health, Academy of Romanian Scientists University ‘Ovidius’ Constanţa Constanța Romania

6. Institute for the Care of Mother and Child Prague Czech Republic

7. 3rd Medical School of Charles University Prague Czech Republic

8. Perinatal Epidemiology and Reproductive Health Unit, CR2 School of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Brussels Belgium

9. Nursing Department School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid Madrid Spain

10. Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare (IQTIG) Berlin Germany

11. Health Monitoring Unit Ministry of Health Nicosia Cyprus

12. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Institute of Mother and Child Warsaw Poland

13. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University Medical Centre Ljubljana Slovenia

14. The Centre for Disease Prevention and Control of Latvia Riga Latvia

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo assess changes in caesarean section (CS) rates in Europe from 2015 to 2019 and utilise the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) to evaluate the contribution of different obstetric populations to overall CS rates and trends.DesignObservational study utilising routine birth registry data.SettingA total of 28 European countries.PopulationBirths at ≥22 weeks of gestation in 2015 and 2019.MethodsUsing a federated model, individual‐level data from routine sources in each country were formatted to a common data model and transformed into anonymised, aggregated data.Main Outcome MeasuresBy country: overall CS rate. For TGCS groups (by country): CS rate, relative size, relative and absolute contribution to overall CS rate.ResultsAmong the 28 European countries, both the CS rates (2015, 16.0%–55.9%; 2019, 16.0%–52.2%) and the trends varied (from −3.7% to +4.7%, with decreased rates in nine countries, maintained rates in seven countries (≤ ± 0.2) and with increasing rates in 12 countries). Using the TGCS (for 17 countries), in most countries labour induction increased (groups 2a and 4a), whereas multiple pregnancies (group 8) decreased. In countries with decreasing overall CS rates, CS tended to decrease across all TGCS groups, whereas in countries with increasing rates, CS tended to increase in most groups. In countries with the greatest increase in CS rates (>1%), the absolute contributions of groups 1 (nulliparous term cephalic singletons, spontaneous labour), 2a and 4a (induction of labour), 2b and 4b (prelabour CS) and 10 (preterm cephalic singletons) to the overall CS rate tended to increase.ConclusionsThe TGCS shows varying CS trends and rates among countries of Europe. Comparisons between European countries, particularly those with differing trends, could provide insight into strategies to reduce CS without clinical indication.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference26 articles.

1. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates;Betran AP;BMJ Global Health,2021

2. Perinatal health monitoring through a European lens: eight lessons from the euro‐Peristat report on 2015 births;Zeitlin J;BJOG,2019

3. Using Robson's ten‐Group classification system for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the euro‐Peristat study;Zeitlin J;BJOG,2021

4. PeristatE MacfarlaneA.Euro‐Peristat Project. European Perinatal Health Report. Core Indicators of the Health and Care of Pregnant Women and Babies in Europe in 2015.2018.

5. Classification of caesarean sections;Robson MS;Fetal Matern Med Rev,2001

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3