Accuracy of sonographic lower segment thickness and prediction of vaginal birth after caesarean in a resourced‐limited setting; Prospective study

Author:

Adu‐Takyi Charles1,Munazzah Rafique2,Owusu Yaw Gyanteh1,Owusu‐Bempah Atta1,Arhin Bernard3,Opare‐Addo Henry Sakyi14,Peprah Amponsah14,Collins Sally L.5ORCID,Adu‐Bredu Theophilus15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Directorate Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital Kumasi Ghana

2. Women's Centre John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford UK

3. Research and Development Unit Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital Kumasi Ghana

4. Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology Kumasi Ghana

5. Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health University of Oxford Oxford UK

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo assess the accuracy of ultrasound measurement of the lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness against findings at laparotomy, and to investigate its correlation with the success rate of vaginal birth after one previous caesarean delivery (CD) in a resource‐limited setting.DesignProspective study.SettingObstetrics and Gynaecology department in a tertiary hospital in Ghana.PopulationWomen with one previous CD undergoing either a trial of labour (TOLAC) or elective CD.MethodsMyometrial lower uterine segment thickness (mLUS) and full lower uterine segment thickness (fLUS) were measured with transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS). The women were managed according to local protocols with the clinicians blinded to the ultrasound measurements. The LUS was measured intraoperatively for comparison with ultrasound measurements.Main outcome measuresLower uterine segment findings at laparotomy, successful vaginal birth.ResultsA total of 311 pregnant women with one previous CD were enrolled; 147 women underwent elective CD and 164 women underwent a TOLAC. Of the women that underwent TOLAC, 96 (58.5%) women had a successful vaginal birth. The mLUS was comparable to the intraoperative measurement in the elective CD group with LUS thickness <5 mm (bias of 0.01, 95% CI −0.10 to 0.12 mm) whereas fLUS overestimated LUS <5 mm (bias of 0.93, 95% CI 0.80–1.06 mm). Successful vaginal birth rate correlated with increasing mLUS values (odds ratio 1.30, 95% CI 1.03–1.64). Twelve cases of uterine defect were recorded. LUS measurement ≤2.0 mm was associated with an increased risk of uterine defects with a sensitivity of 91.7% (95% CI 61.5–99.8%) and specificity of 81.8% (95% CI 75.8–86.8%).ConclusionAccurate TVUS measurement of the LUS is technically feasible in a resource‐limited setting. This approach could help in making safer decisions on mode of birth in limited‐resource settings.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3