Obstetrical providers’ preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Obstetrical providers’ preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study

Published:2018-02-22 Issue:10 Volume:125 Page:1294-1302
ISSN:1470-0328
Container-title:BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
language:en
Short-container-title:BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy

Author:

Rivo JC¹,Amyx M²³,Pingray V³,Casale RA⁴,Fiorillo AE⁵,Krupitzki HB⁵,Malamud JD⁶,Mendilaharzu M⁷,Medina ML⁷,del Pino AB⁶,Ribola L⁴,Schvartzman JA⁵,Tartalo GM⁷,Trasmonte M⁴,Varela S⁴,Althabe F³,Belizán JM³,

Affiliation:

1. Duke University School of Medicine; Duke University; Duke University Medical Center Greenspace; Durham NC USA

2. Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine; New Orleans LA USA

3. Mother and Child Health Research Department; Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET); Buenos Aires Argentina

4. Hospital Nacional A. Posadas; El Palomar Buenos Aires Province Argentina

5. Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas; ‘Norberto Quirno’ (CEMIC); Autonomous City Buenos Aires Argentina

6. Sanatorio de la Mujer; Rosario Santa Fe Province Argentina

7. Instituto de Maternidad y Ginecología Nuestra Señora de las Mercedes; San Miguel de Tucumán Tucumán Province Argentina

Funder

National Institutes of Health Training in Global Reproductive Epidemiology

National Institutes of Health

Fogarty International Center

Office of AIDS Research

National Cancer Center

National Heart, Blood, and Lung Institute

Johns Hopkins University

Health Resources and Services Administration

Child Health Epidemiology Doctoral Training Program

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.15122/fullpdf

Reference53 articles.

1. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014;Betrán;PLoS ONE,2016

2. Rising trend in non-indicated caesarean deliveries: can the trend be reversed?;Althabe;Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol,2017

3. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys;Vogel;Lancet Glob Health,2015

4. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America;Villar;The Lancet,2006

5. NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request;NIH;NIH Consens State Sci Statements,2006

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Guideline documents on caesarean section on maternal request in Sweden: varying usability with a restrictive approach;BMC Health Services Research;2023-10-18

2. Perceptions of Obstetrics/Gynecology Surgeons on Non-medically Indicated Cesarean Sections: A Cross-Sectional Study;Cureus;2023-09-01

3. Obstetrical provider preferences for cesarean delivery on maternal request in uncomplicated pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature;American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM;2023-05

4. Clinicians’ views of factors influencing decision-making for CS for first-time mothers—A qualitative descriptive study;PLOS ONE;2022-12-28

5. Midwives’ personal and professional attitudes towards women’s delivery choices, interventions and neonatal care;Journal of Perinatal Medicine;2022-09-13