Quality of life in patients with advanced ovarian cancer after primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Results from the randomised SCORPION trial (NCT01461850)

Author:

Marchetti Claudia12ORCID,Giannarelli Diana3,Vizzielli Giuseppe1,Ferrandina GabriellaM.12,Tortorella Lucia1,Fanfani Francesco12,Costantini Barbara1,Pasciuto Tina4,Scambia Giovanni12,Fagotti Anna12

Affiliation:

1. Division Gynaecologic Oncology Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS Rome Italy

2. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Rome Italy

3. Biostatistics Unit, Scientific Directorate IRCCS, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Rome Italy

4. Statistical Technology Archiving Research (STAR) Centre Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS Rome Italy

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo investigate the effect of treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS), versus primary debulking surgery (PDS), on quality of life (QoL) in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).DesignRandomised trial conducted in a single institution.SettingDivision of Gynaecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.SamplePatients with stage‐IIIC/IV EOC and high tumour load.MethodsPatients were randomised (1:1) to undergo either PDS (PDS group) or NACT followed by IDS (NACT/IDS group).Main outcome measuresQuality‐of‐life (QoL) data, assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core QoL questionnaire (QLQ‐C30) and ovarian cancer module (OV28); co‐primary outcomes were the QLQ‐C30 global health score at 12 months (cross‐sectional analysis) and the difference in mean QLQ‐C30 global health score over time between treatment groups (longitudinal analysis).ResultsFrom October 2011 to May 2016, 171 patients were enrolled (PDS = 84; NACT/IDS = 87). We observed no clinical or statistically significant difference between treatment groups in any of the QoL functioning scales at 12 months, including QLQ‐C30 global health score (NACT/IDS group vs PDS group, mean difference 4.7, 95% CI −4.99 to 14.4, p = 0.340). Over time, we found lower global health scores for those undergoing PDS than for those receiving NACT (difference in mean score 6.27, 95% CI 0.440–12.11, p = 0.035), albeit this was not clinically relevant.ConclusionsWe found no difference in global QoL related to treatment approach at 12 months, even though patients in the NACT/IDS group reported better global health scores across the 12‐month period compared with the PDS group; these findings further confirm that NACT/IDS might be a feasible option for patients unsuitable for PDS.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference18 articles.

1. Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery;Bryant A;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2022

2. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer;Coleridge SL;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2021

3. Quality of life of advanced ovarian cancer patients in the randomized phase III study comparing primary debulking surgery versus neo-adjuvant chemotherapy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3