Vacuum extraction or caesarean section in the second stage of labour: A systematic review

Author:

Thierens Stephanie12ORCID,van Binsbergen Annelien13ORCID,Nolens Barbara4ORCID,van den Akker Thomas56ORCID,Bloemenkamp Kitty7ORCID,Rijken Marcus J.18ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Julius Global Health, The Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Spaarne Gasthuis Haarlem The Netherlands

3. Department of Surgery Bernhoven Hospital Bernhoven The Netherlands

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen The Netherlands

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden The Netherlands

6. Athena Institute VU University Amsterdam The Netherlands

7. Department of Obstetrics, Division Women and Baby, WKZ Birth Centre University Medical Centre Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands

8. Department of Obstetrics Amsterdam University Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundProlonged second stage of labour is an important cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Vacuum extraction (VE) and second‐stage caesarean section (SSCS) are the most commonly performed obstetric interventions, but the procedure chosen varies widely globally.ObjectivesTo compare maternal and perinatal morbidity, mortality and other adverse outcomes after VE versus SSCS.Search StrategyA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE. Studies were critically appraised using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale.Selection CriteriaAll artictles including women in second stage of labour, giving birth by vacuum extraction or cesarean section and registering at least one perinatal or maternal outcome were selected.Data Collection and AnalysisThe chi‐square test, Fisher exact's test and binary logistic regression were used and various adverse outcome scores were calculated to evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes.Main ResultsFifteen articles were included, providing the outcomes for a total of 20 051 births by SSCS and 32 823 births by VE. All five maternal deaths resulted from complications of anaesthesia during SSCS. In total, 133 perinatal deaths occurred in all studies combined: 92/20 051 (0.45%) in the SSCS group and 41/32 823 (0.12%) in the VE group. In studies with more than one perinatal death, both conducted in low‐resource settings, more perinatal deaths occurred during the decision‐to‐birth interval in the SSCS group than in the VE group (5.5% vs 1.4%, OR 4.00, 95% CI 1.17–13.70; 11% vs 8.4%, OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.85–2.26). All other adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes showed no statistically significant differences.ConclusionsVacuum extraction should be the recommended mode of birth, both in high‐income countries and in low‐ and middle‐income countries, to prevent unnecessary SSCS and to reduce perinatal and maternal deaths when safe anaesthesia and surgery is not immediately available.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference56 articles.

1. World Health Organization [Internet].Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO UNICEF UNFPA World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. [cited 15 June 2022]. Available from:https://www.unfpa.org/featured‐publication/trends‐maternal‐mortality‐2000‐2017

2. Global, regional, national, and selected subnational levels of stillbirths, neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015

3. World Health Organization [Internet].Trends in maternal mortality: 1990‐2015: estimates from WHO UNICEF UNFPA World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. World Health Organization. 2015 [Cited 15 June 2022]. Available from:https://www.unfpa.org/publications/trends‐maternal‐mortality‐1990‐2015

4. Global, regional, and national levels of maternal mortality, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015

5. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3