Benefits and limitations of implantable loop recorders in the very elderly

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundImplantable loop recorder (ILR) allows rhythm‐monitoring up to 3 years. They are recommended in patients with recurrent syncope and for the detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with cryptogenic thromboembolic events. AF and syncope occur more often in elderly patients. However, data in this cohort is limited.Methods and resultsAll patients ≥ 80 years undergoing ILR‐implantation between 2011 and 2022 in our center were included. Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) and oral anticoagulation due AF were defined as primary endpoints. Forty‐five patients ≥ 80 years were included, 33 because of recurrent syncope and 12 because of suspected AF. The average follow up (FU) was 17.6 months. Overall in 22 patients, ILR‐implantation led to a therapeutic consequence (48.9%). In the 12 patients who underwent ILR‐implantation for detection of AF, AF was detected in nine patients (75%). In the 33 elderly patients who received ILR‐implantation after syncope, 11 underwent PPI during FU (33.3%). One patient accidentally removed the ILR himself via the implantation‐wound, and no other ILR‐related complications were observed.ConclusionILR are effective and safe in elderly patients. AF was often found in patients with suspected AF, especially in patients after catheter ablation of only documented atrial flutter (AFlu). PPI‐rate was high in patients with recurrent syncope and ILR‐implantation. Further investigations are necessary to determine whether PPI may be considered in elderly patients with syncope even in the absence of a bifascicular block.