Current landscape of kidney allocation: Organ procurement organization perspectives

Author:

Concepcion Beatrice P.1,Harhay Meera234ORCID,Ruterbories Jay5,Finn Jan6ORCID,Wiseman Alex7ORCID,Cooper Matthew8ORCID,Mohan Sumit91011ORCID,Doshi Mona D.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine Division of Nephrology and Hypertension Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

2. Department of Medicine Drexel University College of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

4. Penn Transplant Institute University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. Donor Alliance Denver Colorado USA

6. Midwest Transplant Network Westwood Kansas USA

7. Centura Transplant Denver Colorado USA

8. Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee Wisconsin USA

9. Department of Medicine Division of Nephrology Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons New York New York USA

10. The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group New York New York USA

11. Department of Epidemiology Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University New York New York USA

12. Department of Medicine Division of Nephrology University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

Abstract

AbstractOrgan procurement organizations (OPOs) play a central role in the recovery, preservation, and distribution of deceased donor kidneys for transplantation in the United States. We conducted a national survey to gather information on OPO practices and perceived barriers to efficient organ placement in the face of the new circle‐based allocation and asked for suggestions to overcome them. Of the 57 OPOs, 44 responded (77%). The majority of OPOs (61%) reported barriers to obtaining a kidney biopsy, including lack of an available pathologist. Most OPOs (55%) indicated barriers to pumping owing to a lack of available staff and transportation. Respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the new allocation system has worsened transportation challenges (85%), increased provisional acceptances of kidneys (66%), increased communication challenges with transplant centers (68%), and worsened the efficiency of organ allocation (83%). OPO‐suggested solutions include making transplant centers more accountable for inefficient selection practices, developing reliable transportation options, and removing the requirement for national sharing. These findings underscore the need to examine closely the trade‐offs of the new allocation system with respect to costs, organ ischemia, and discard. These findings may help inform practice and policy for overcoming transportation barriers and improving the efficiency of organ placement.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Transplantation

Reference31 articles.

1. Geographic disparities in transplantation

2. Geographic disparity in kidney transplantation under KAS

3. Factors leading to the discard of deceased donor kidneys in the United States

4. Implications of the Advancing American Kidney Health Initiative for kidney transplant centers

5. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) Conditions for Coverage Final Rule: Revisions to Outcome Measures for OPOs CMS‐3380‐F. Published 2020. Accessed April 1 2022.https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact‐sheets/organ‐procurement‐organization‐opo‐conditions‐coverage‐final‐rule‐revisions‐outcome‐measures‐opos

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3