Feasibility and safety of a robotic approach to diverticular disease: a retrospective series of short‐term outcomes

Author:

Bromley Luke1ORCID,Huang Dora1,Mohan Helen123ORCID,Rajkomar Amrish2ORCID,Larach José Tomas2,Heriot Alexander23ORCID,Smart Philip1234,Warrier Satish235

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Surgery Austin Health Melbourne Victoria Australia

2. General Surgery Clinical Institute Epworth Healthcare Melbourne Victoria Australia

3. Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

4. Department of General Surgery St. Vincent's Private Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia

5. Department of Surgery Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundsRobotic colorectal surgery is a method of performing complex surgery in a minimally invasive manner. In diverticular disease, chronic inflammation obscures tissues planes and increases difficulty of resection. This study aims to assess feasibility and safety of application of a robotic approach to diverticular disease, by reviewing short‐term outcomes from a series of diverticular resections.MethodsForty‐one patients underwent robotic colorectal surgery for diverticular disease across three centres within Melbourne from June 2016 to June 2022. Demographic, operative, and clinicopathological data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate primary and secondary outcomes. Comparative analysis between simple and complex diverticular disease was performed to identify differences in groups regarding short term outcomes. The primary outcome in this study is to determine conversion rate from minimally invasive to open surgery. Secondary outcomes include major complication rates and length of stay.ResultsOf the 41 patients, 24 (58.5%) had simple disease, and 17 (41.5%) had complex disease. One patient (2.4%) required conversion to open resection. The median length of stay for complex disease was 7 days, for simple disease 5 days (P = 0.05). Four surgical Clavien‐Dindo III or above complications occurred (9.8%), one patient required return to theatre. There were no anastomotic leaks or collections requiring radiological drainage. Thirteen patients (31.7%) underwent ureteric stenting and intraoperative indocyanine green dye ureteric identification.ConclusionRobotic diverticular resections in this series are safe and associated with a low conversion rate of 2.4%. Robotic resection of complex disease was feasible with an acceptable safety profile.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

Reference13 articles.

1. Diverticular disease: a review on pathophysiology and recent evidence;Piscopo N;Ulster Med. J.,2020

2. Practice Parameters for the Treatment of Sigmoid Diverticulitis

3. Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection for Diverticulitis Decreases Major Morbidity Rates: A Randomized Control Trial

4. Robotic vs. standard laparoscopic technique ‐ what is better?;Köckerling F;Front. Surg.,2014

5. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of robotic resections for diverticular disease

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3