Predictors and mechanisms of self‐stigma in five chronic skin diseases: A systematic review

Author:

Stuhlmann Caroline F. Z.1ORCID,Traxler Juliane1ORCID,Paucke Valentina1,da Silva Burger Neuza1ORCID,Sommer Rachel1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. German Center for Health Services Research in Dermatology (CVderm), Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP) University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf (UKE) Hamburg Germany

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPeople with skin disease suffer due to disease‐related physical symptoms, as well as due to significant psychosocial burden. A major contributor of this burden is the experience of stigmatization. Research indicates that people with visible skin diseases deal with both social stigma and self‐stigma.ObjectiveThis systematic literature review aimed to aggregate existing research on correlates and mechanisms that contribute to self‐stigmatization among people with atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, vitiligo, alopecia areata or hidradenitis suppurativa and to, ultimately, identify targets for psychosocial interventions.MethodsThe review followed PRISMA guidelines. Four databases, PubMed, OVID, Web of Science and PsycINFO were searched for peer‐reviewed articles. Studies were identified by two independent researchers and were eligible if they (1) assessed adults with one of five chronic skin diseases—atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, vitiligo, alopecia areata or hidradenitis suppurativa, (2) measured self‐stigma or relevant synonyms, (3) evaluated psychosocial correlates, predictors or explanatory mechanisms of self‐stigma and (4) were published in German or English in a peer‐reviewed journal. The Johanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Analytical Cross Sectional Studies was used to evaluate the quality of studies.ResultsTwenty‐seven studies were included with a mean quality rating of 7.04 (out of 8). Social stigma, coping strategies (such as lack of acceptance) and lack of social support were identified as main predictors of self‐stigma. Although study quality was good, all but one study had a cross‐sectional design that does not allow examining causal relationships among the determinants of self‐stigma.ConclusionsFindings from the present review revealed several psychosocial variables that are malleable and potentially suitable as intervention targets. Those variables such as acceptance should be targeted in evidence‐based interventions specifically developed to reduce self‐stigma to, ultimately, improve mental health of people affected.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference51 articles.

1. The psychological burden of skin diseases: a cross‐sectional multicenter study among dermatological out‐patients in 13 European countries;Dalgard FJ;J Invest Dermatol,2015

2. Conceptualizing stigma;Link BG;Annu Rev Sociol,2001

3. Translating the WHA resolution in a member state: towards a German programme on ‘Destigmatization’ for individuals with visible chronic skin diseases;Augustin M;J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol,2019

4. World Health Organization.Global Report on Psoriasis.2016. Available at:https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565189(last accessed 14 September 2023).

5. Quality of life and stigmatization profile in a cohort of vitiligo patients and effect of the use of camouflage;Ongenae K;Dermatology,2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3