Process‐oriented models of leaf senescence are biased towards the mean: Impacts on model performance and future projections

Author:

Meier Michael12ORCID,Bugmann Harald1ORCID,Bigler Christof1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Forest Ecology, Department of Environmental Systems Science ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland

2. CEFE, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD Montpellier France

Abstract

AbstractThe timing of leaf senescence in deciduous trees influences carbon uptake and the resources available for tree growth, defense, and reproduction. Therefore, simulated biosphere‐atmosphere interactions and, eventually, estimates of the biospheric climate change mitigation potential are affected by the accuracy of process‐oriented leaf senescence models. However, current leaf senescence models are likely to suffer from a bias towards the mean (BTM). This may lead to overly flat trends, whereby errors would increase with increasing difference from the average timing of leaf senescence, ultimately distorting model performance and projected future shifts. However, such effects of the BTM on model performance and future shifts have rarely been investigated. We analyzed >17 × 106 past dates and >49 × 106 future shifts of leaf senescence simulated by 21 process‐oriented models that had been calibrated with >45,000 observations from Central Europe for three major European tree species. The surmised effects on model performance and future shifts occurred in all 21 models, revealing strong model‐specific BTM. In general, the models performed only slightly better than a null model that just simulates the average timing of leaf senescence. While standard comparisons of model performance favored models with stronger BTM, future shifts of leaf senescence were smaller when projected by models with weaker BTM. Overall, the future shifts for 2090–2099 relative to 1990–1999 increased by an average of 13–14 days after correcting for the BTM. In conclusion, the BTM substantially affects simulations by state‐of‐the‐art leaf senescence models, which compromises model comparisons and distorts projections of future shifts. Smaller shifts result from flatter trends associated with stronger BTM. Therefore, smaller shifts according to models with weaker BTM illustrate the considerable uncertainty in current leaf senescence projections. It is likely that state‐of‐the‐art projections of future biosphere behavior under global change are distorted by erroneous leaf senescence models.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Environmental Science,Ecology,Environmental Chemistry,Global and Planetary Change

Reference97 articles.

1. The influence of the soil on spring and autumn phenology in European beech

2. Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it

3. Photoperiod sensitivity of bud burst in 14 temperate forest tree species

4. Beaudoing H. &Rodell M.(2019).GLDAS Noah land surface model L4 3 hourly 0.25 × 0.25 degree V2.0 (GLDAS_NOAH025_3H_2.0)[Data set]. NASA/GSFC/HSL.https://doi.org/10.5067/342OHQM9AK6Q

5. Beaudoing H. &Rodell M.(2020).GLDAS Noah land surface model L4 3 hourly 0.25 × 0.25 degree V2.1 (GLDAS_NOAH025_3H_2.1)[Data set]. NASA/GSFC/HSL.https://doi.org/10.5067/E7TYRXPJKWOQ

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3