Disability workforce and the NDIS planning process in regional, rural and remote regions of Australia: Scoping review
-
Published:2023-07-23
Issue:5
Volume:31
Page:839-854
-
ISSN:1038-5282
-
Container-title:Australian Journal of Rural Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Australian J Rural Health
Author:
Gilroy John1ORCID,
Veli‐Gold Sarah1,
Wright Wayne2,
Dew Angela3,
Jensen Heather1,
Bulkeley Kim1,
Lincoln Michelle4
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
2. Orange Local Aboriginal Land Council Orange New South Wales Australia
3. Faculty of Health Deakin University Burwood Victoria Australia
4. Faculty of Medicine Canberra University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThe Australian geographically rural and remote disability workforce has historically demonstrated difficulties to keep up with the demand for quality services and supports for people with disability. In 2013, the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) was launched to provide individualised disability support packages to meet people's needs. To receive funding, people with disability are required to develop a NDIS plan. That plan is then funded by the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA), the government agency responsible for managing the NDIS. Although the NDIS has been operating for almost 10 years, there is limited research into the planning experiences of the workforce in regional, rural and remote regions of Australia. This review aims to ascertain the level of scholarly investigation into workers' experiences of NDIS planning.MethodologyResearch publication databases were searched using a specific search string to identify publications that included reference to the workforce's experiences of the NDIS planning process in regional, rural and remote regions of Australia. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was adopted to appraise the quality of the research publications. Research publications that focused on those working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were also appraised using the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Quality Appraisal Tool developed by the Centre for Excellence in Aboriginal Chronic Disease Knowledge Translation and Exchange. A thematic synthesis of the publications was undertaken to ascertain disability and health workforce experiences of the NDIS planning process.ResultsSeven papers met the selection criteria. Two papers were policy reviews and reported the improvements of the NDIS planning process since its inception. These studies reported four reoccurring themes: (1) cultural/socioeconomic and geographical factors; (2) administrative burden and bureaucracy; (3) values, culture and geography; and (4) burden on allied health workers.ConclusionThe NDIS planning process has developed and progressed since its rollout in 2013. There are limited research papers available that describe the workforce's experience of the planning process in regional, rural and remote regions. More research in this area is needed to identify the experiences of the disability workforce in relation to the NDIS planning process.
Funder
Australian Research Council
Subject
Family Practice,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health