Use of continuous glucose monitors in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A scoping review

Author:

Bernabe‐Ortiz Antonio12ORCID,Carrillo‐Larco Rodrigo M.34ORCID,Safary Elvis5,Vetter Beatrice5ORCID,Lazo‐Porras María16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia Lima Peru

2. Universidad Científica del Sur Lima Peru

3. Emory Global Diabetes Research Center Emory University Atlanta Georgia USA

4. Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health Emory University Atlanta Georgia USA

5. FIND Geneva Switzerland

6. Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine University of Geneva and Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland

Abstract

AbstractAimsThe use of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) has been shown to have positive impact on diabetes management for people with type 1 diabetes (T1DM), type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and gestational diabetes (GDM) in high‐income countries. However, as useful as CGMs are, the experience in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) is limited and has not been summarized.MethodsA scoping review of the scientific literature was conducted. Medline, Embase, Global Health and Scopus were used to seek original research conducted in LMICs. The search results were screened by two reviewers independently. We included studies assessing health outcomes following the use of CGMs at the individual level (e.g. glycaemic control or complications) and at the health system level (e.g. barriers, facilitators and cost‐effectiveness) in English, Portuguese, Spanish and French. Results were summarized narratively.ResultsFrom 4772 records found in database search, 27 reports were included; most of them from China (n = 7), Colombia (n = 5) and India (n = 4). Thirteen reports studied T1DM, five T2DM, seven both T1DM and T2DM and two GDM. Seven reports presented results of experimental studies (five randomized trials and two quasi‐experimental); two on cost‐effective analysis and the remaining 18 were observational. Studies showed that CGMs improved surrogate glycaemic outcomes (HbA1c reduction), hard endpoints (lower hospitalization rates and diabetes complications) and patient‐oriented outcomes (quality of life). However, several caveats were identified: mostly observational studies, few participants in trials, short follow‐up and focused on surrogate outcomes.ConclusionsThe scoping review identified that studies about CGMs in LMICs have several limitations. Stronger study designs, appropriate sample sizes and the inclusion of patient‐important outcomes should be considered to inform the evidence about CGMs for the management of people with diabetes in LMICs.

Funder

Direktion für Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3