Influence of quality of life related to perceived foot health between in a rural an urban population: A case–control research

Author:

Andreo‐García María Victoria1,Navarro‐Flores Emmanuel2ORCID,Losa‐Iglesias Marta Elena3ORCID,Becerro‐de‐Bengoa‐Vallejo Ricardo4ORCID,López‐López Luis1ORCID,Saavedra‐García Miguel Ángel5ORCID,López‐López Daniel1ORCID,Gómez‐Salgado Juan67ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Research, Health, and Podiatry Group, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Industrial Campus of Ferrol Universidade da Coruña Ferrol Spain

2. Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Department of Nursing, University of Valencia Frailty Research Organizaded Group (FROG) Valencia Spain

3. Faculty of Health Sciences Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Alcorcon Spain

4. Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry Universidad Complutense de Madrid Madrid Spain

5. Group of Research in Sport Science (INCIDE), Department of Physical Education and Sport Universidade da Coruña A Coruña Spain

6. Department of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, Faculty of Labour Sciences University of Huelva Huelva Spain

7. Safety and Health Postgraduate Programme Universidad Espíritu Santo Guayaquil Ecuador

Abstract

AbstractFoot problems are very common in the community. Studies indicate that between 18% and 63% of people have foot pain or stiffness and that foot problems have a large impact on people's functional decline and a significant detrimental impact on measures of quality of life related to health. The general objective of this research was to compare foot health in people from the rural population compared to people from the urban population and its relationship with quality of life. A case–control descriptive study was developed with a sample of 304 patients, 152 patients from the rural population and 152 patients from the urban population. Quality of life was measured through the SF‐36 Health Questionnaire in its Spanish version. The rural population group had a mean age of 46.67 ± 13.69 and the urban population group 49.02 ± 18.29. Regarding the score of the lowest levels of quality of life related to foot problems, the rural population group compared to the urban population group showed: for body pain (52.21 ± 30.71 vs. 67.80 ± 25.28, p < 0.001); and for mental health (69.58 ± 18.98 vs. 64.60 ± 14.88, p < 0.006). Differences between groups were analysed using Student's t‐test for independent samples, which showed statistical significance (p < 0.05). This research offers evidence that the rural population presents better levels of mental health and lower levels of bodily pain in the domains of the SF‐36 Health Questionnaire comparing with the urban population.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3