Acceptability, engagement and exploratory outcomes and costs of a co‐designed intervention to support children of parents with a mental illness: Mixed‐methods evaluation and descriptive analysis

Author:

Bauer Annette1ORCID,Cartagena‐Farias Javiera1,Christiansen Hanna2,Goodyear Melinda3ORCID,Schamschula Mona4,Zechmeister‐Koss Ingrid5,Paul Jean6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Care Policy and Evaluation Centre London School of Economics and Political Science London UK

2. Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Department of Psychology Philipps University Marburg Marburg Germany

3. School of Rural Health Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

4. Mental Health Research Program The Village, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft Wien Austria

5. Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH Wien Austria

6. Division of Psychiatry I, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics Medical University Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria

Abstract

AbstractChildren whose parents have a mental illness are much more likely to experience mental health problems and other adverse long‐term impacts. Child‐centred psychosocial interventions can be effective, but not much is known about how to design and implement them in different settings. A pre‐post, mixed methods, single‐arm evaluation of a co‐designed social support intervention with parents and children (4–18 years) measured parents' mental health (PHQ‐9), perceived social support (ENRICHD), parental self‐efficacy (PSAM) and children's mental health (SDQ), quality of life (Kidscreen‐27), and child service use (CAMHSRI‐EU) at baseline and 6 months. Qualitative data were gathered at 6 months to explore parents' and children's experience with the intervention. Twenty‐nine parents and 21 children completed baseline and follow‐up questionnaires; 22 parents and 17 children participated in interviews. Parents' depression (MD −1.36, SD 8.08), perceived social support (MD 1, SD 5.91), and children's mental health potentially improved, and children's service use and costs potentially reduced (€224.6 vs. €122.2, MD 112.4). Parental self‐efficacy was potentially reduced (MD −0.11, SD 3.33). The sample was too small to perform statistical analysis. Favourable themes emerged describing the high satisfaction with the intervention, parents' improved understanding of the impact of their mental health problems on children, and improvements in parent–child relationships. This study contributes to an emerging evidence base for co‐designed child‐centred interventions to prevent the transgenerational transmission of poor mental health.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3