The perennial biogas crops cup plant (Silphium perfoliatum L.) and field grass pose better autumn and overwintering habitats for arthropods than silage maize (Zea mays L.)

Abstract

AbstractPerennial energy crops (PECs) can reduce the negative impacts of intensive silage maize cultivation on agroecosystems in Central Europe. Furthermore, the remaining vegetation of PECs after harvest may provide suitable habitat and more beneficial overwintering conditions for arthropods than maize. It was hypothesized that after harvest and in winter, arthropod abundance and biomass are higher in PECs than in silage maize. In a field experiment arranged in a factorial split‐plot design of eight main plots (plot size: 240 m2), the two PECs cup plant (Silphium perfoliatum L.) and field grass were compared with silage maize (Zea mays L.) regarding their suitability as autumn (post‐harvest) and overwintering habitats for arthropods. Soil temperature, moisture as well as biomass and abundance of autumn‐active and overwintering arthropods were analyzed for these three crops. Suction sampling was used during autumn and emerging arthropods were sampled with emergence trap sets in spring. In PEC plots, soils were moister and less exposed to cold temperatures than in silage maize. Compared with silage maize, total arthropod abundance and biomass were higher in PEC plots for both sampling periods. Results were similar for most examined arthropod taxa. The results of this study demonstrate that, compared with silage maize, PECs provide suitable post‐harvest habitats and constitute more suitable overwintering habitats for arthropods. Differences are likely to be based on lack of disturbance and the provision of vegetation structures after harvest that function as overwintering habitats for arthropods. It can be concluded that the positive effects of PECs on ground arthropods are not limited to their growing time but continue to a certain extend after harvest and during winter.