Stakeholder engagement in European brain research: Experiences of the Lifebrain consortium

Author:

Budin‐Ljøsne Isabelle1ORCID,Friedman Barbara B.2,Baaré William F. C.3ORCID,Bartrés‐Faz David4ORCID,Carver Rebecca B.5ORCID,Drevon Christian A.67ORCID,Ebmeier Klaus P.8ORCID,Fjell Anders M.2ORCID,Ghisletta Paolo91011ORCID,Henson Richard N.12ORCID,Kievit Rogier1213ORCID,Madsen Kathrine S.314ORCID,Nawijn Laura1516ORCID,Suri Sana8ORCID,Solé‐Padullés Cristina4ORCID,Walhovd Kristine B.2ORCID,Zsoldos Enikő8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Food Safety Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway

2. Department of Psychology, Center for Lifespan Changes in Brain and Cognition University of Oslo Oslo Norway

3. Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—Amager and Hvidovre Copenhagen Denmark

4. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Neurosciences University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain

5. Department of Communications Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway

6. Vitas AS Oslo Norway

7. Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway

8. Department of Psychiatry, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Warneford Hospital University of Oxford Oxford UK

9. Methodology and Data Analysis Group, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland

10. Faculty Council of the Faculty of Psychology UniDistance Suisse Brig Switzerland

11. Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research LIVES University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland

12. MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

13. Cognitive Neuroscience Department Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands

14. Radiography, Department of Technology University College Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

15. Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

16. Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionStakeholder engagement remains scarce in basic brain research. However, it can greatly improve the relevance of investigations and accelerate the translation of study findings to policy. The Lifebrain consortium investigated risk and protective factors influencing brain health using cognition, lifestyle and imaging data from European cohorts. Stakeholder activities of Lifebrain—organized in a separate work package—included organizing stakeholder events, investigating public perceptions of brain health and dissemination. Here, we describe the experiences of researchers and stakeholders regarding stakeholder engagement in the Lifebrain project.MethodsStakeholder engagement in Lifebrain was evaluated through surveys among researchers and stakeholders and stakeholders' feedback at stakeholder events through evaluation forms. Survey data were analysed using a simple content analysis approach, and results from evaluation forms were summarized after reviewing the frequency of responses.ResultsConsortium researchers and stakeholders experienced the engagement activities as meaningful and relevant. Researchers highlighted that it made the research and research processes more visible and contributed to new networks, optimized data collection on brain health perceptions and the production of papers and provided insights into stakeholder views. Stakeholders found research activities conducted in the stakeholder engagement work package to be within their field of interest and research results relevant to their work. Researchers identified barriers to stakeholder engagement, including lack of time, difficulties in identifying relevant stakeholders, and challenges in communicating complex scientific issues in lay language and maintaining relationships with stakeholders over time. Stakeholders identified barriers such as lack of budget, limited resources in their organization, time constraints and insufficient communication between researchers and stakeholders.ConclusionStakeholder engagement in basic brain research can greatly benefit researchers and stakeholders alike. Its success is conditional on dedicated human and financial resources, clear communication, transparent mutual expectations and clear roles and responsibilities.Public ContributionPatient organizations, research networks, policymakers and members of the general public were involved in engagement and research activities throughout the project duration.

Funder

Directorate-General XII, Science, Research, and Development

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3