The efficacy of interventions to prevent type 2 diabetes among women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus—A living systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Lee Vivian Y.12ORCID,Monjur Mohammad R.3,Santos Joseph Alvin1,Patel Anushka12,Liu Rong12,Di Tanna Gian Luca124,Gupta Yashdeep5ORCID,Goyal Alpesh5ORCID,Ajanthan Saumiyah6,Praveen Devarsetty278,Lakshmi J. K.278,de Silva H. Asita9,Tandon Nikhil5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The George Institute for Global Health Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. Faculty of Medicine University of New South Wales Kensington New South Wales Australia

3. South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Sydney New South Wales Australia

4. Department of Innovative Technologies University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland Manno Switzerland

5. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi India

6. RemediumOne Colombo Sri Lanka

7. The George Institute for Global Health New Delhi India

8. Prasanna School of Public Health Manipal India

9. Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine University of Kelaniya Colombo Sri Lanka

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWhile previously considered a transient condition, with no lasting adverse impact, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is now a well‐established risk factor for developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The risk of developing T2DM appears to be particularly high in the first few years after childbirth, providing a compelling case for early intervention. This review provides an up‐to‐date systematic review and meta‐analysis to assess the effectiveness of interventions to reduce incidence of T2DM in women with a recent history of GDM.MethodsThe search was conducted on October 20, 2023 with an annual surveillance planned for the next 5 years to maintain a living systematic review. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials of any type in women within 5 years of GDM‐complicated pregnancy that reported outcomes of T2DM diagnosis or measures of dysglycemia with a follow‐up of at least 12 months.ResultsSeventeen studies met our inclusion criteria and have been included in this review. There were 3 pharmacological and 14 lifestyle interventions. Intervention was not associated with significant reduction in the primary outcome of T2DM (risk ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43–1.41; p = 0.41; I2 = 79%) compared with the control group (placebo or usual care). However, meta‐analysis of the four studies reporting hazard ratios suggested a reduction in diabetes incidence (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.48–0.97; p = 0.03; I2 = 31%).ConclusionThis review provides equivocal evidence about the efficacy of interventions to reduce the risk of T2DM in women within 5 years of GDM‐complicated pregnancy and highlights the need for further studies, including pharmacotherapy.image

Publisher

Wiley

Reference46 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3