Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor therapy and retinal non‐perfusion in diabetic retinopathy: A meta‐analysis of randomised trials

Author:

Nanji Keean12ORCID,Sarohia Gurkaran S.3,Xie Jim1ORCID,Patil Nikhil S.1ORCID,Phillips Mark2,Zeraatkar Dena2,Thabane Lehana245,Guymer Robyn H.67,Kaiser Peter K.8,Sivaprasad Sobha9,Sadda Srinivas R.10,Wykoff Charles C.11,Chaudhary Varun12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology McMaster University 2757 King Street East Hamilton Ontario Canada

2. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact McMaster University 1280 Main Street West Hamilton Ontario Canada

3. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences University of Alberta 2319 Active Treatment Centre, 10240 Kingsway Avenue NW Edmonton Alberta Canada T5H 3V8

4. Biostatistics Unit St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton Hamilton Ontario Canada

5. Faculty of Health Sciences University of Johannesburg Johannesburg South Africa

6. Centre for Eye Research Australia Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital East Melbourne Victoria Australia

7. Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology) the University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia

8. Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic 9500 Euclid Avenue Cleveland Ohio USA

9. NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre Moorfields Eye Hospital London UK

10. Doheny Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine University of California – Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA

11. Retina Consultants of Texas, Houston, Texas, Blanton Eye Institute Houston Methodist Hospital Houston Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeRetinal non‐perfusion (RNP) is fundamental to disease onset and progression in diabetic retinopathy (DR). Whether anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‐VEGF) therapy can modify RNP progression is unclear. This investigation quantified the impact of anti‐VEGF therapy on RNP progression compared with laser or sham at 12 months.MethodsA systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were performed; Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched from inception to 4th March 2022. The change in any continuous measure of RNP at 12 months and 24 months was the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Outcomes were reported utilising standardised mean differences (SMD). The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool version‐2 and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines informed risk of bias and certainty of evidence assessments.ResultsSix RCTs (1296 eyes) and three RCTs (1131 eyes) were included at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Meta‐analysis demonstrated that RNP progression may be slowed with anti‐VEGF therapy compared with laser/sham at 12 months (SMD: −0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.29, −0.06; p = 0.003; I2 = 0; GRADE rating: LOW) and 24‐months (SMD: −0.21; 95% CI: −0.37, −0.05; p = 0.009; I2 = 28%; GRADE rating: LOW). The certainty of evidence was downgraded due to indirectness and due to imprecision.ConclusionAnti‐VEGF treatment may slightly impact the pathophysiologic process of progressive RNP in DR. The dosing regimen and the absence of diabetic macular edema may impact this potential effect. Future trials are needed to increase the precision of the effect and inform the association between RNP progression and clinically important events.PROSPERO RegistrationCRD42022314418.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ophthalmology,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3