Psychological treatments for temporomandibular disorder pain—A systematic review

Author:

Christidis Nikolaos1ORCID,Al‐Moraissi Essam Ahmed2ORCID,Al‐Ak'hali Mohammed Sultan3,Minarji Natalie1,Zerfu Bethel1,Grigoriadis Anastasios1,Schibbye Robert4,Christidis Maria56

Affiliation:

1. Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Department of Dental Medicine Karolinska Institutet, and Scandinavian Center for Orofacial Neurosciences Huddinge Sweden

2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry Thamar University Dhamar Yemen

3. Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry Jazan University Jazan Saudi Arabia

4. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Dental Medicine Karolinska Institutet, and Scandinavian Center for Orofacial Neurosciences Huddinge Sweden

5. The Swedish Red Cross University, The Institute of Health Sciences Huddinge Sweden

6. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society Karolinska Institutet Huddinge Sweden

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTemporomandibular disorders (TMD) are common. They affect abilities for carrying out daily tasks and influence different psychological aspects. In addition to standard treatment, psychological treatments have been suggested. The aim was to investigate the effects of psychological treatments on patients with painful TMD in a short‐ and long‐term perspective.Materials and MethodsAn electronic search was conducted in the databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting psychological interventions for TMD. Registered beforehand in PROSPERO (CRD42022320106). In total, 18 RCTs were included; six RCTs that could be used in the meta‐analysis, and all 18 RCTs were used in the narrative synthesis. Risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane's tool for assessing risk of bias and certainty of evidence by GRADE.ResultsThe narrative synthesis indicates that psychological treatment options seem equivalent to standard treatment for painful TMD. The meta‐analysis showed that a combination of psychological treatment and standard treatment and manual treatment (very low‐quality evidence) are significantly better in pain reduction than just counselling and standard treatments of TMD.ConclusionThis study indicates that psychological treatments seem to reduce pain intensity in individuals with painful TMD, and that the effect seems to be equally good as standard treatment. However, a combination of psychological treatments and standard treatments seems to have an even better effect. This indicates that psychological treatments are promising as an additional treatment approach for painful TMDs.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3