Author:
Powell Tia,Lowenstein Bruce
Abstract
In theory, a competent patient may refuse any and all treatments, even those that sustain life. The problem with this theory, confidently and frequently asserted, is that the circumstances of real patients may so confound us with their complexity as to shake our confident assumptions to their core.For instance, it is not the case that one may always and easily know which patients are competent. Indeed, evaluation of decision-making capacity is notoriously difficult. Not only may reasonable and experienced evaluators, say a judge and a psychiatrist, disagree, but also a person's capacity may change from hour to hour and may extend to some decisions yet not to others. And yet it is on this subtle art of capacity evaluation that life and death decisions often turn, especially when patients decline life-sustaining treatment.An evaluation of capacity may consider the impact of serious medical or psychiatric illness, as well as the patient's life circumstances.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference29 articles.
1. Care of the Hopelessly Ill
2. “The Choice to End Life as a Ventilator-Dependent Quadriplegic,”;Maynard;Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,1987
3. Law and the Life Sciences: When Suicide Prevention Becomes Brutality: The Case of Elizabeth Bouvia
4. 8. Id. A C1 lesion is an injury sustained to the upper part of the spinal cord. The injury results in quadriplegia and ventilatory dependence.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献