Quality of Life and Non-Treatment Decisions for Incompetent Patients: A Critique of the Orthodox Approach

Author:

Dresser Rebecca S.,Robertson John A.

Abstract

Since the Quinlan decision in 1976, courts and legislatures have made substantial progress in defining rules to govern nontreatment of dying and debilitated patients. For example, the right of the competent patient to refuse necessary care is now widely established, and the legality of withdrawing respirators and even nutrition and hydration from permanently unconscious patients is increasingly recognized.More difficult questions arise, however, when the patient is neither competent nor permanently unconscious, but instead is in a conscious, severely demented and debilitated state, with experiences that appear quite limited. Thousands of patients in this condition are cared for in private homes, hospitals, and nursing homes, the victims of stroke, senility, Alzheimer's disease, and other illnesses. Even though they usually require only low-tech, minimally supportive care, such patients can impose great stress on their families and high financial costs on the health care system.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference56 articles.

1. 24. Parfit, D. , Reasons and Persons 302–06 (1984).

2. 19. Strunk v. Strunk, 445 S.W.2d 145 (Ky. 1969); Robertson, , “Incompetent Organ Donors and the Substituted Judgment Doctrine,” 76 Columbia Law Review 48–78 (1976).

3. 26. Competent individuals generally retain the opportunity to alter their choices to accommodate their altered interests to the extent a person's prior choices concerning career, health, residence, and promises to others permit them to do so. Incompetent persons should also be able to free themselves from prior choices when their current interests require it, and others have not changed their position in reliance on their past directives.

4. “The Case of Mary Hier: When Substituted Judgment Becomes Sleight of Hand,”;Annas;Hastings Center Report,1984

5. “Treatment Dilemmas for Imperiled Newborns: Why Quality of Life Counts,”;Rhoden;Southern California Law Review,1985

Cited by 105 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3