Differences in Regulatory Frameworks Governing Genetic Laboratories in Four Countries
-
Published:2009
Issue:2
Volume:37
Page:351-357
-
ISSN:1073-1105
-
Container-title:Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J. Law. Med. Ethics
Author:
Tassé Anne Marie,Petit Élodie,Godard Béatrice
Abstract
A recent Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) survey demonstrated that an internationalization of genetic laboratory services currently emerged from the rarity of certain genetic abnormalities and from the small of laboratories performing specialized testing. When DNA samples cross national boundaries for genetic testing services to be performed in another country, the heterogeneity of national legal frameworks raises important questions regarding quality of genetic services available internationally.Some aspects of the genetic laboratories’ services are abundantly discussed by the literature, among which most prominent are quality control standards and patients rights. Firstly, a 2003 study identified key distinctions between the different legal frameworks for genetic services. While some countries impose exhaustive regulatory requirements, others favor guidelines for good practices. Moreover, proficiency assessment, clinical validity, retention of laboratory records and test reports are not dealt with uniformly.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference61 articles.
1. La qualité des analyses de biologie médicale
2. 41. Laboratory Requirements, 42 C.F.R. § 493.17.
3. 49. See Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA), supra note 38; Laboratory Requirements, supra note 41.
4. 10. Australian Government – Attorney-General's Department, COMLAW Commonwealth of Australia Law, available at (last visited April 5, 2009).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献