Author:
Kesselheim Aaron S.,Avorn Jerry
Abstract
Only 19 new molecular entities and 3 biologics were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2007, the lowest rate in 24 years. This disappointing output occurred despite steady clinical trial and regulatory review times, the FDA maintaining high approval rates, and the pharmaceutical industry consistently reporting increasing revenues. A government report suggests that fewer new drug applications have been submitted to the FDA by the pharmaceutical industry in recent years. These data have rekindled the debate as to the origins of pharmaceutical innovation and the comparative importance of public and private sources in contributing to drug discovery. The pharmaceutical industry contends that its research is responsible for most new medicines, and that the primary public institution supporting U.S. biomedical research, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), supports medical innovation “distinct from the process of drug development.”
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference32 articles.
1. Flows of knowledge from universities and federal laboratories: Modeling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries
2. Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators
3. Extensions Of Intellectual Property Rights And Delayed Adoption Of Generic Drugs: Effects On Medicaid Spending
4. 21. National Science Foundation, “U.S. Industrial R&D Performers Report Increased Expenditures for 2004,” December 2006, available at (last visited March 27, 2009).
5. 1. Blum, J. “FDA Approves 19 new U.S. drugs, Fewest Since '83; Glaxo Leads,” Bloomberg News, January 8, 2008, available at (last visited March 25, 2009).
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献