Abstract
In purity and holiness I will guard my life and my art.Every physician-patient encounter is a conflict of interest. Every physician-payer encounter is also a conflict of interest.Wide-spread criticism of the pharmaceutical industry’s extravagant marketing practices and some doctors’ undignified, even appalling eagerness to stuff themselves, their pockets and their offices with the industry’s “stuff,” prompted physician groups, the drug and device industry itself (albeit synergized by the federal government’s ominous shadow) to institute reforms designed better to limit industry influence on physicians.But according to Troyen Brennan and his coauthors, the reforms, while reducing some of the most egregious instances of industry influence peddling and physicians’ self-debasement, were doomed fundamentally, for three reasons. First, they were based on common sense but incorrect assumptions about the mechanism of industry influence and on myths about the efficacy of disclosure as an ethical disinfectant. Second, they relied on voluntary adherence and so failed to pinpoint responsibility for monitoring compliance and enforcement.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference58 articles.
1. “Gifts to Physicians from Industry,”;McMurray;JAMA,1991
2. “Zero Tolerance,” a form of ethical absolutism, has become an unfortunately popular surrogate for “ethical seriousness.” It manifests in pronouncements of state medical boards. Thus the North Carolina Medical Board's position statement on “The Physician-Patient Relationship provides, ‘Patient trust …requires that: there be no conflict of interest between the patient and the physician or third parties.’”;NCMB Forum,2007
3. 31. Meinhard v. Salmon, 164 N.E. 545 (N.Y. 1928).
4. “Toward a Theory of the Ethics of Bureaucratic Organizations,”;Buchanan;Business Ethics Quarterly,1996
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献