Author:
Paradise Jordan,Wolf Susan M.,Kuzma Jennifer,Kuzhabekova Aliya,Tisdale Alison W.,Kokkoli Efrosini,Ramachandran Gurumurthy
Abstract
Devising appropriate oversight for nanotechnology is a challenge. The field spans many scientific disciplines and product areas, capitalizing on the unusual properties and capabilities of material at the atomic scale. The critical feature of nanotechnology is not only the size at which manufacture occurs (˜1-100 nanometers), but also the ability to control and manipulate the novel chemical, physical, and mechanical properties that emerge at this scale, including increased conductivity, optical properties, and reactivity. As nano-products enter the research and development (R&D) phase, hit the market, and enter consumer households, debate has emerged on oversight approaches. Regulators, manufacturers, and commentators are considering whether existing oversight systems are sufficient, those oversight systems need adjustment, or new oversight systems are needed.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference61 articles.
1. 12. Id.
2. Semiconductor Nanocrystals as Fluorescent Biological Labels
3. 5. For purposes of analysis, oversight of drugs and medical devices was analyzed in a single article due to commonalities between the two oversight systems at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Throughout this comparative article, we will refer to that single article as containing two case studies. Thus, there are a total of five case studies (oversight of GEOs, drugs, devices, workplace chemicals, and gene therapy).
4. 38. Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 651–678 (2008).
5. “Science and Democracy,”;Wilsdon;Nature Nanotechnology,2009
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献