Author:
Post Linda Farber,Blustein Jeffrey,Gordon Elysa,Dubler Nancy Neveloff
Abstract
As medical technology becomes more sophisticate the ability to manipulate nature and manage disease forces the dilemma of when can becomes ought. Indeed, most bioethical discourse is framed in terms of balancing the values and interests and the benefits and burdens that inform principled decisions about how, when, and whether interventions should occur. Yet, despite advances in science and technology, one caregiver mandate remains as constant and compelling as it was for the earliest shaman—the relief of pain. Even when cure is impossible, the physician's duty of care includes palliation. Moreover, the centrality of this obligation is both unquestioned and universal, transcending time and cultural boundaries.Although universally acknowledged, pain is a complex phenomenon for both the patient and the caregiver, influenced as much by personal values and cultural traditions as by physiological injury and disease.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference78 articles.
1. “Misconceptions and Controversies Regarding the Use of Opioids in Cancer Pain,”;Foley;Anti-Cancer Drugs,1995
2. “Patient Variable Biases in Clinical Judgment: Conceptual Overview and Considerations,”;Lopez;Psychological Bulletin,1989
3. 63. See supra notes 20–29 and accompanying text.
4. 53. See Kiev, , supra note 38, at 104; and Beauchamp, Childress, , supra note 30, at 150.
5. 41. Making Health Care Decisions, supra note 38, at 20.
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献