Abstract
Today's hospitals and health care facilities are being increasingly subjected to pressures to monitor the quality of the health care provided in their institution. One vehicle is the courts which, utilizing the doctrine of hospital corporate liability, have imposed a duty upon the hospital to use reasonable care in the selection and maintenance of physicians on its medical staff. This article will discuss three different approaches from three different states.The first case is Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital, decided by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in January 1981. In its decision, the court sought to answer two questions: “Does a hospital owe a duty to its patients to use due care in the selection of its medical staffand the granting of specialized surgical (orthopedic) privileges?;” and second, “What is the standard of care that a hospital must exercise in the discharge of this duty to its patients…?”
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference30 articles.
1. 6. Id. at 163.
2. 18. Fridena v. Evans, 622 P.2d 463 (Ariz. 1980).
3. Hospital Corporate Liability: The Trend Continues
4. 19. Id. at 465.
5. 14. 235 N.E.2d 671 (Ill. App. 1968).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献