Abstract
Is it futile to sustain biologic life when the patient will permanently require intensive medical care? Dr. Koch and Dr. Miles agree that such treatment would be futile; however, their concept of futility rests on no explicit standards and reflects no communal judgment. The authors view the lack of widely accepted medical standards as an impediment to answering this question definitively. Dr. Koch laments that patients and their families have seized too much power and have begun deciding that mere biologic life is worth sustaining. And Dr. Miles sees benefit to perceiving a decision not to sustain such life as “primarily biomedical” and “realistic.”Here is where we disagree with these authors. We do not see the problem as a lack of standards that are medical. The question of prolonging a patient's life when the patient has no likelihood of regaining consciousness confronts moral, political, and economic issues.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference8 articles.
1. Medical Futility
2. 5. See Koch, et al., supra note 1.
3. 7. Cruzan v. Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S.-.111 L.Ed.2d 224, 110 S.Ct 2841 (1990).
4. 4. See Miles, , supra note 2.
5. Medical Futility, Medical Necessity: The-Problem-without-a-Name
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献