Physicians Should Treat Mentally Ill Death Row Inmates, Even if Treatment is Refused
-
Published:2010
Issue:4
Volume:38
Page:774-788
-
ISSN:1073-1105
-
Container-title:Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J. Law. Med. Ethics
Author:
McDonnell Melissa,Phillips Robert T. M.
Abstract
The history of physician involvement in capital proceedings is longstanding and ripe with controversy and conflicts of ethical concerns. Previously one of us (Phillips) has written that the controversy is more appropriately characterized as a conflict of moral position rather than one of ethical dilemma.In hindsight, we believe that analysis, while true, does not capture the depth or complexity of the issue.Forensic psychiatric evaluations, including competency to be executed evaluations, are done with a clear understanding that no physician-patient relationship exists. Treatment, however, is not so neatly re-categorized in large measure because it involves the physician’s active provision of the healing arts.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference193 articles.
1. A crisis in the ethical and moral behavior of psychiatrists
2. “The Psychiatrist as Evaluator: Conflicts and Conscience,”;Phillips;New York Law School Law Review,1996
3. 137. Id., at 1022.
4. 97. Id., at 214.
5. 170. Id., at 56–58.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. References;Introduction to Forensic Psychology;2012