Business vs. Medical Ethics: Conflicting Standards for Managed Care

Author:

Mariner Wendy K.

Abstract

The increased competition for a share of the market of insured patients, which arose in the wake of failed comprehensive health care reform, has provoked questions about what, if any, standards will govern new “competitive” health care organizations. Managed care arrangements, which typically shift to providers and patients some or all of the financial risk for patient care, are of special concern because they can create incentives to withhold beneficial care from patients. Of course, fee-for-service (FFS) medical practice creates incentives to provide unnecessary services, and managed care can avoid that type of harm. Still, as Edmund Pellegrino has noted, “managed care, by its nature, places the good of the patient into conflict with … (1) the good of all the other patients served by the plan; (2) the good of the plan and the organization, themselves…; and (3) the self-interest of the physician.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference67 articles.

1. 58. Anders, George , “HMOs Pile Up Billions in Cash, Try to Decide What to Do With It,” Wall Street Journal, Dec. 21, 1994, at A1, A5; and Freudenheim, Milt , “Penny-pinching H.M.O.'s Showed Their Generosity in Executive Paychecks,” New York Times, Apr. 11, 1995, at D1, D4. In remarks to Congress on August 30, 1995, H. Ross Perot was reported to say, “If someone were to ask me what is my principal concern about H.M.O.'s, it's the giant concentration of power; it's the giant salaries.... You know, that doesn't look good to me.” See Pear, Robert , “Perot Tells Senate Committee It's Time to Get Experts' Opinion on Reining in Medicare,” New York Times, Aug. 31, 1995, at B13.

2. “Managed Care —Jekyll or Hyde?,”;Clancy;JAMA,1995

Cited by 40 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. In Defence of Wish Lists;Business and Professional Ethics Journal;2023

2. Reconciling Medical Ethics and Entrepreneurship: Convergence and Divergence Debates;Medical Entrepreneurship;2023

3. Physicians and Businessmen: Contradictions in Health Care;The International Library of Bioethics;2022

4. An Uncertain Future for Medicine: Business or Profession?;The International Library of Bioethics;2022

5. Medicine and the Courts;The International Library of Bioethics;2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3