Moral Grounding for the Participation of Children as Organ Donors

Author:

Ross Lainie Friedman

Abstract

More than 24,000 patients await organ transplants and the number is increasing yearly. Living donors are an important source of transplant organs. In this paper, I argue that we can morally justify allowing children to serve as donors. Yet, I also argue that their participation must be restricted in order to prevent their exploitation.The paper is divided into six sections. In the first section, I show why the traditional principles of personal autonomy and beneficence are not adequate morally to justify the participation of children in the nontherapeutic role of organ donor. Next, I argue that the moral justification of the child’s participation must be based on the intimate family relationship which permits activities that would be unacceptable in the public domain. In the third section, I argue that family autonomy ought to be limited by the principle of respect for persons. In the fourth section, I propose five principles to guide the participation of children as organ donors. In section five, I discuss the role of the child in the decision-making process. In section six, I critically examine the criteria for equity in donor selection.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference32 articles.

1. 3. Even if the child is competent to give informed consent, one could still require parental authorization under the notion of family autonomy (See Part V). Thus, even the competent child's autonomy would not be adequate to justify his participation as an organ donor.

2. Organ donations can be classified into categories based on risk: minimal (low) risk, a slight increase over minimal risk (moderate risk), and significant risk. The distinctions will depend on such factors as the procedural risks that the harvesting entails (e.g. the type of anesthesia), the reversibility of the donation (e.g. bone marrow replenishes in several months whereas a kidney is never regenerated), and the long-term morbidity.

3. 20. See Purdy, supra note 19.

4. 9. I will expand this argument in section six, below, to require an intimate relationship between the authorizing parents, the child-donor and the recipient.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Ethics of Children Donating Tissue to Another;Children as Tissue Donors;2018

2. The Interfamilial Principle and the Harvest Festival;European Journal of Health Law;2016-02-10

3. Gillick, bone marrow and teenagers;Medico-Legal Journal;2015-04-24

4. The Wrong Harvest: The Law on Saviour Siblings;International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family;2015-02-11

5. Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights;Journal of Medical Ethics;2013-05-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3