Author:
Botkin Jeffrey R.,Mehlman Maxwell J.
Abstract
“Wrongful birth” is a controversial malpractice action, which has arisen in the past two decades, secondary to an expanding knowledge of human genetics and the constitutionally protected access to abortion. Under the wrongful birth claim, parents of a child with a congenital illness or abnormality may bring suit against a physician who allegedly failed to provide appropriate prenatal counseling or information. Typically, the parents claim that they were inadequately warned of a potential problem in their child, and that this paucity of timely information prevented them from avoiding the pregnancy or from obtaining an abortion. While these cases have arisen in a variety of clinical circumstances, a characteristic example is the obstetrician who fails to offer amniocentesis to a woman of advanced maternal age who subsequently gives birth to a child with Down syndrome. Since the parents were prevented from learning of the abnormality and therefore exercising the option to terminate the pregnancy, they may claim damages for themselves for the wrongful birth of the infant.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference55 articles.
1. “To Be or Not To Be: The Pennsylvania General Assembly Eliminates Wrongful Birth and Life Actions,”;Lyons;Villanova L. Rev.,1989
2. 42. Moores v. Lucas, 405 So.2d 1022 (Fla. App. 1981).
3. 47. Lloyd v. North Broward Hospital Dist., 570 So.2d 984 (Fla. App. 3d Dist. 1990).
4. 40. Dorlin v. Providence Hospital, 325 N.W.2d 600 (Mich. 1982).
5. “Instability of 550-base Pair DNA Segment and Abnormal Methylation in Fragile X Syndrome,”;Oberle;Science,1991
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献