Author:
Vernick Jon S.,Mair Julie Samia
Abstract
In our experience, public health practitioners (rather than scholars) seeking to address a health problem often have just two very basic questions about the law: (1) how can I use the law to create new interventions, or improve existing ones, to protect the public’s health; and (2) will the law prevent me from successfully implementing certain interventions? In this way, the law is seen as either an opportunity for intervention to affect a public health problem, or an obstacle to enacting or implementing a desired intervention.In addition, because some public health practitioners may not fully understand the intricacies of a given legal area, some possible obstacles to intervention may be either real or perceived. A real legal obstacle is not necessarily an insurmountable one, but it does have genuine legal force. A perceived obstacle has little, if any, true legal application to a given kind of intervention.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference158 articles.
1. Effects of Maryland's law banning Saturday night special handguns on crime guns
2. 9. 18 U.S.C. § 925(d)(3) (2000).
3. Strategic Thinking About Gun Markets and Violence
4. 98. See, e.g., Washington v. Resolution Trust Corp., 68 F.3d 935, 939 (5th Cir. 1995) (“The common law of torts, including the concept of duty, evolves in light of the changing conditions and circumstances of society.”).
5. “The New Public Health Litigation,”;Teret;Annual Review of Public Health,2000
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献