1. The Right of Privacy;Warren;Harvard Law Review,1890
2. 78. See Appointment of Guardians, supra note 38, at 347 n.44, citing Tyrrell, supra note 10; In re Slamey, 146 N.E.2d 466 (Ohio App. 1957) (error to refuse to allow defendant's attorney to examine, but decision reversed on other grounds).
3. Remaining Responsible: On Control of One's Health Needs in Aging;Alexander;Santa Cura Law Review,1980
4. 62. In re DeLucca, , 426 A.2d 32 (N.H. 1981).
5. 47. Sometimes the causal linkage requirement is ignored or misplaced in reported opinions. See Pennsylvania Estate Guardianship, supra note 2, at 1060. See also In re Estate of Stevenson, 256 N.E.2d 766 (Ill.), cert, denied, 400 U.S. 850 (1970). “The justification for the appointment of a conservator is founded primarily on the incapability of managing one's person or estate and not on the cause of that incapability.” 256 N.E.2d at 769. See also Oak Park Trust & Savings Bank v. Fisher, 225 N.E.2d 377, 384 (Ill. App. 1967) (medical testimony causally linked defendant's cerebral arteriosclerosis and her inability to manage her estate).