Analysis of trifecta outcomes in a single center with robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy for T1b renal tumors

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThis study was performed to investigate the preoperative factors associated with difficulty achieving trifecta in robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy for clinical T1b renal cell carcinoma.MethodsAmong 187 patients who underwent robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy at our hospital from March 2012 to February 2022, we retrospectively examined 30 patients with unilateral single clinical T1b renal cell carcinoma with at least 6 months of postoperative follow‐up, excluding patients with hereditary disease. The following factors were examined in detail: patient‐related factors, perioperative factors, surgical techniques, tumor factors, and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores. We examined the preoperative factors associated with difficulty achieving trifecta. A positive surgical margin was pathologically defined as the presence of tumor cells at the margin of the resected specimen or visually defined as intraoperative tumor incision or pseudocapsular damage.ResultsOf the 30 patients in this study, 12 achieved trifecta and 18 did not. The reasons for not achieving trifecta were a warm ischemia time of >25 min (66.7%), positive surgical margin (23.3%), and Clavien–Dindo grade ≥3 complications (13.3%) (with overlapping factors). No patients had a pathologically positive surgical margin. Visually positive surgical margins were confirmed by the surgical records and surgical videos. Achieving trifecta was challenging in the multivariate analysis when the “L” component of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score was ≥2 points.ConclusionA preoperative “L” component of ≥2 points in the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score was associated with difficulty achieving trifecta.