Conventional suspension delivery versus tattooing pen‐assisted suspension delivery in non‐cultured epidermal cell suspension procedure for vitiligo: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract

AbstractNon‐cultured epidermal suspension (NCES) is one of the most widely used surgical therapy for stable vitiligo patients in which recipient size preparation plays an important role in the outcome of NCES. The primary objective is to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of conventional suspension delivery after manual dermabrasion (CSMD) versus tattooing pen‐assisted suspension delivery (TPSD) in NCES. Paired vitiligo units (VU) in 36 patients, matched with respect to size and location were divided into two groups. The VU in Group 1 underwent suspension delivery by CSMD while the VU in Group 2 underwent same by TPSD. All the VU were followed up at regular intervals until 24 weeks. At the end of 24 weeks, 31 VU (86.1%) in Group 1 achieved >75% repigmentation which was significantly higher (p = .02, chi‐square test) as compared to 22 VU (61.1%) in Group 2. The color matching in both the groups VU was also comparable (p = .84, chi‐square test). The patient global assessment (PGA) was significantly higher in Group 1 VU as compared to Group 2. Treatment response in terms of repigmentation and PGA was significantly better in VU treated with CSMD as compared to TPSD. Recipient site complications were seen more commonly in Group 1 VU as compared to Group 2. Perilesional halo at the recipient site was seen in none of the VU in Group 2 which was significantly lower than 6 VU in Group 1 than (p = .02, chi‐square test). Better results may be possible with technical improvisations in tattooing pen needle diameter and depth of penetration.