Insomnia Severity Index: A reliability generalisation meta‐analysis

Author:

Cerri Luíza Quinália1,Justo Mariana Carvalho1,Clemente Vanda23ORCID,Gomes Ana Allen34,Pereira Anabela Sousa567,Marques Daniel Ruivo13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Education and Psychology, Campus Universitário de Santiago University of Aveiro Aveiro Portugal

2. Sleep Medicine Centre Coimbra University Hospital Centre (CHUC) Coimbra Portugal

3. CINEICC ‐ Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences University of Coimbra Coimbra Portugal

4. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences University of Coimbra Coimbra Portugal

5. Department of Psychology, Colégio Pedro da Fonseca, Rua da Barba Rala University of Évora Évora Portugal

6. Center for Research in Education and Psychology (CIEP) University of Évora Evora Portugal

7. William James Center for Research – WJCR/UA Aveiro Portugal

Abstract

SummaryThe aim of the current study was to conduct a reliability generalisation (RG) meta‐analysis of Cronbachʼs alpha for the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). A systematic search of three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) from inception to 12 March 2021 was performed. Publications that reported Cronbachʼs alpha for the total ISI score were included. Only psychometric‐focussed studies were considered. Meta‐analysis was carried out using a random‐effects model to derive a pooled estimate of Cronbachʼs alphas. The number of participants in the included publications ranged from 25 to 12,056, with 33 studies (42 estimates) comprising internal consistency coefficients, and a combined sample size of N = 29,688. The age range of the included publications was from 13.4 to 74.3 years. Data extraction implied 33 publications out of 706 found through the database search. Cronbachʼs alphas ranged from 0.65 to 0.92. The majority of the reported coefficients were ≥0.7 and presented a low risk of bias (n = 32). The pooled alpha coefficient was 0.83 (IC [0.81–0.85]; SE = 0.009) with high heterogeneity among the included publications (I2 = 97%). Subgroup analyses including moderators such as continent, setting, risk of bias, and age did not affect significantly the overall result. In general, the cumulative estimate of Cronbachʼs alpha for the ISI is good. However, this finding should be interpreted with caution since there is a high heterogeneity level and some of the studies might not have checked the assumptions underlying Cronbach's alphas.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Cognitive Neuroscience,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3