Long‐term survival and success rate of dental implants placed in reconstructed areas with extraoral autogenous bone grafts: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the long‐term survival and success rates of implants placed in reconstructed areas using microvascularized or non‐microvascularized extraoral bone grafts.Materials and MethodsAn electronic search was performed in five databases and in gray literature for articles published until June, 2023. The eligibility criteria comprised observational studies (prospective or retrospective) and clinical trials, reporting survival and success rates of implants placed in extraoral bone grafts. A meta‐analysis (implant failure) was categorized into subgroups based on the type of bone graft used. The risk of bias within studies was assessed using the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale.ResultsThirty‐one studies met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow‐up time was 92 months. The summary estimate of survival rate at the implant level were 94.9% (CI: 90.1%–97.4%) for non‐vascularized iliac graft, 96.5% (CI: 91.4%–98.6%) for non‐vascularized calvaria graft, and 92.3% (CI: 89.1%–94.6%) for vascularized fibula graft. The mean success rate and marginal bone loss (MBL) were 83.2%; 2.25 mm, 92.2%; 0.93 mm, and 87.6%; 1.49 mm, respectively.ConclusionsImplants placed in areas reconstructed using extraoral autogenous bone graft have high long‐term survival rates and low long‐term MBLs. The data did not demonstrate clinically relevant differences in the survival, success, or MBL of grafts from different donor areas or with different vascularization.This systematic review was registered in INPLASY under number INPLASY202390004.