Impact of keratinized mucosa on implant‐health related parameters: A 10‐year prospective re‐analysis study

Author:

Mancini Leonardo123ORCID,Strauss Franz J.145ORCID,Lim Hyun‐Chang16ORCID,Tavelli Lorenzo37ORCID,Jung Ronald E.1ORCID,Naenni Nadja1ORCID,Thoma Daniel S.18ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

2. Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences University of L'Aquila L'Aquila Italy

3. Center for Clinical Research and Evidence Synthesis in Oral Tissue Regeneration (CRITERION) Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Faculty of Dentistry Universidad Finis Terrae Santiago Chile

5. Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry University of Chile Santiago Chile

6. Department of Periodontology, Periodontal‐Implant Clinical Research Institute Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry Seoul Korea

7. Department of Oral Medicine, Infection, and Immunity, Division of Periodontology Harvard School of Dental Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA

8. Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration Yonsei University College of Dentistry Seoul Korea

Abstract

AbstractAimTo investigate whether the lack of keratinized mucosa (KM) affects peri‐implant health after 10 years of loading.Materials and MethodsData from 74 patients with 148 implants from two randomized controlled studies comparing different implant systems were included and analyzed. Clinical parameters including bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), plaque index, marginal bone loss (MBL), and KM width (KMW) at buccal sites were collected at baseline (time of the final prosthesis insertion), 5‐year and 10 years postloading. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models by means of a generalized estimated equation (GEE) were used to evaluate the influence of buccal KM on peri‐implant clinical parameters; BOP, MBL, PD, and adjusted for implant type (one‐piece or two‐piece) and compliance.ResultsA total of 35 (24.8%) implants were healthy, 67 (47.5%) had mucositis and 39 (27.6%) were affected by peri‐implantitis. In absence of buccal KM (KM = 0 mm), 75% of the implants exhibited mucositis, while in the presence of KM (KMW >0 mm) 41.2% exhibited mucositis. Regarding peri‐implantitis, the corresponding percentages were 20% (KM = 0 mm) and 26.7% (KM >0 mm). Unadjusted logistic regression showed that the presence of buccal KM tended to reduce the odds of showing BOP at buccal sites (OR: 0.28 [95% CI, 0.07 to 1.09], p = 0.06). The adjusted logistic regression model revealed that having buccal KM (OR: 0.21 [95% CI, 0.05 to 0.85], p = 0.02) and using two‐piece implants (OR: 0.34 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.75], p = 0.008) significantly reduced the odds of showing BOP. Adjusted linear regression by means of GEE showed that KM and two‐piece implants were associated with reduced MBL and MBL changes (p < 0.05).ConclusionThe lack of buccal KM appears to be linked with peri‐implant parameters such as BOP and MBL, but the association is weak. The design of one‐piece implants may account for their increased odds of exhibiting BOP.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3