Affiliation:
1. The Philosophy Department and The Faculty of Law The Hebrew University Jerusalem Israel
Abstract
AbstractPolitical philosophy should focus not on uplifting ideals, but rather, so I argue, on minimizing serious suffering. This is so not because other things do not ultimately matter (they do), but rather because in the political context, the stakes in terms of suffering are usually extremely high, so that any other considerations are almost always outweighed. Put in moderately deontological terms: the high stakes carry most political decisions across the thresholds of the relevant deontological constraints. While the argument is substantive rather than exegetical, I engage in detail Judith Shklar's “Liberalism of Fear”. I share with Shklar her pessimistic starting point, but I also show how a focus on suffering (rather than cruelty and fear) is what plausibly follows from such a starting point. I then pursue the implications of this difference—they are theoretically profound, but perhaps less significant practically.
Funder
Israel Science Foundation
Reference37 articles.
1. Deontology, individualism, and uncertainty: A reply to Jackson and Smith;Aboodi R.;The Journal of Philosophy,2008
2. Alexander L. &Moore M.(2020).Deontological ethics.The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics‐deontological/
3. Brink D.(2018).Mill's moral and political philosophy.The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mill‐moral‐political/
4. The authority of democracy;Christiano T.;The Journal of Political Philosophy,2004
5. Coady C. A. J.(2018).The problem of dirty hands.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dirty‐hands/
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献