Perinatal outcomes after regional analgesia during labour

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundRegional analgesia is a common and effective form of in‐labour analgesia. However, there are concerns whether it is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.AimsTo examine the association between regional analgesia and maternal and neonatal outcomes.Materials and MethodsA retrospective population‐based cohort study of singleton term births in Victoria, Australia, between 2014 and 2020. Women who received regional analgesia were compared with women who did not. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions were used.ResultsThere were 107 013 women who received regional analgesia and 214 416 women who did not. Compared to women who did not receive regional analgesia, regional analgesia was associated with an increased risk of instrumental birth (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.59, 95% CI: 3.52–3.67), caesarean section (aOR = 2.30, 95% CI: 2.24–2.35), longer duration of the second stage of labour (β coefficient = 26.6 min, 95% CI: 26.3–27.0), Apgar score below seven at five minutes (aOR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.21–1.39), need for neonatal resuscitation (aOR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.40–1.48), need for formula in hospital (aOR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.65–1.72), and the last feed before discharge not exclusively from the breast (aOR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.56–1.62).ConclusionRegional analgesia use in labour was associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. These findings may add to the risk–benefit discussion regarding regional analgesia for pain relief and highlight the importance of shared decision‐making. Further large prospective studies and randomised controlled trials will be useful.