Affiliation:
1. Institute for Environmental Studies Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands
2. Kellogg Biological Station Michigan State University Hickory Corners Michigan USA
3. Geomatic and Landscape Ecology Research Laboratory Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada
4. Department of Life Sciences Imperial College London Ascot UK
Abstract
AbstractRecent international agreements have strengthened and expanded commitments to protect and restore native habitats for biodiversity protection (“area‐based biodiversity conservation”). Nevertheless, biodiversity conservation is hindered because how such commitments should be implemented has been strongly debated, which can lead to suboptimal habitat protection decisions. We argue that, despite the debates, there are three essential principles for area‐based biodiversity conservation. These principles are related to habitat geographic coverage, amount, and connectivity. They emerge from evidence that, while large areas of nature are important and must be protected, conservation or restoration of multiple small habitat patches is also critical for global conservation, particularly in regions with high land use. We contend that the many area‐based conservation initiatives expected in the coming decades should follow the principles we identify, regardless of ongoing debates. Considering the importance of biodiversity for maintenance of ecosystem services, we suggest that this would bring widespread societal benefits.