Tools for assessing the quality of life of hysterectomized women: A systematic review

Author:

Taheri Mahdiye1ORCID,Simbar Masoumeh2ORCID,Ebadi Abbas3ORCID,Dolatian Mahrokh2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

2. Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Midwifery and Reproductive Health Research Center Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

3. Nursing Care Research Center, Clinical Sciences Institute Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

Abstract

AbstractAims and ObjectivesSince hysterectomy surgery is a major and invasive procedure, it can affect the quality of life of women in many ways. This study aimed to review and critique the psychometric properties of tools used to measure the quality of life of hysterectomized women.MethodAn advanced search was conducted in international (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, Embase) as well as national databases (SID and Magiran) to retrieve articles published from 2000 to 2024, using keywords related to hysterectomy and quality of life. Then, the psychometric properties of the tools found in these articles were evaluated by COSMIN checklist.ResultsThe psychometric properties of tools were analyzed using the COSMIN checklist. Among the 20 general and specific tools examined, content validity had not been evaluated in 15 tools, construct validity had not been evaluated in four tools, criterion validity had not been evaluated in eight tools, internal consistency had not been evaluated in five tools, responsiveness had not been evaluated in 16 tools, and interpretability had not been assessed in 18 tools, and measurement error had not been evaluated in any of the tools.ConclusionThe results showed that none of the evaluated tools have all the criteria of Cosmin's checklist. Of course, construct validity and reliability had been assessed in most of the tools. Meanwhile, there was no tool to measure the quality of life of hysterectomized women specifically. Therefore, it seems that developing a tool with acceptable psychometric properties is necessary to measure the quality of life of hysterectomized women specifically.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference62 articles.

1. Prevalence, sociodemographic determinants and self‐reported reasons for hysterectomy in India;Shekhar C;Reprod Health,2019

2. Incidence and determinants of hysterectomy in a low-income setting in Gujarat, India

3. Risk factors for peripartum hysterectomy among women with postpartum haemorrhage: analysis of data from the WOMAN trial;Huque S;BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2018

4. Comparison of quality of life in women with hysterectomy and hormonal therapy due to abnormal uterine bleeding;Kazemi A;Pars J Med Sci,2022

5. Survey of hysterectomy and its indications in Ahvaz Imam Khomeini Medical Hospital in 2009–2011 years;Saadati N;J Prev Med,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3