Intra‐individual comparison of prostate‐specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography versus bone scan in detecting skeletal metastasis at prostate cancer diagnosis

Author:

Shanmugasundaram Ramesh12ORCID,Saad Jeremy1ORCID,Heyworth Ash3,Wong Veronica23,Pelecanos Anita4,Arianayagam Mohan1,Canagasingham Bertram1,Ferguson Richard1,Goolam Ahmed Saeed1,Khadra Mohamed12,Kam Jonathan1ORCID,Ko Raymond1,McCombie Stephen156ORCID,Varol Celi1,Winter Matthew1,Mansberg Robert23,Nguyen Diep23,Bui Chuong3,Loh Han23,Le Ken3,Roberts Matthew J.1278ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Nepean Urology Research Group Kingswood New South Wales Australia

2. University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. Department of Nuclear Medicine Nepean Hospital Kingswood New South Wales Australia

4. Statistics Unit QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Brisbane Queensland Australia

5. Fiona Stanley Hospital Murdoch Western Australia Australia

6. University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia Australia

7. Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Herston Queensland Australia

8. University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research Herston Queensland Australia

Abstract

ObjectivesTo compare the diagnostic performance and radiological staging impact of 68Ga‐prostate‐specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) compared to 99Tc whole‐body bone scan (WBBS) for the detection of skeletal metastasis in the primary staging of prostate cancer (PCa).Patients and MethodsA prospective institutional database was retrospectively examined for patients who underwent both PSMA PET and WBBS within a 1 week interval for PCa primary staging. Lesions were categorised as ‘negative’, ‘equivocal’, or ‘definite’ based on nuclear medicine physician interpretation. Metastatic burden was characterised for each imaging modality according to three groups: (i) local disease (no skeletal metastases), (ii) oligometastatic disease (three or fewer skeletal metastases), or (iii) polymetastatic disease (more than three skeletal metastases).ResultsThere were 667 patients included. The median (interquartile range) prostate‐specific antigen level was 9.2 (6.2–16) ng/mL and 60% of patients were high risk according to a modified D'Amico risk classification. The overall distribution of skeletal metastasis detection changed across the two scans overall (P = 0.003), being maintained within high‐risk (P = 0.030) and low‐risk (P = 0.018) groups. PSMA PET/CT identified more definite skeletal metastases compared to WBBS overall (10.3% vs 7.3%), and according to risk grouping (high: 12% vs 9%, intermediate: 4% vs 1%). Upstaging was more common with PSMA PET/CT than WBBS (P = 0.001). The maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumour was associated with upstaging of skeletal metastases on PSMA PET/CT (P = 0.025), while age was associated with upstaging on WBBS (P = 0.021). The SUVmax of the primary tumour and metastases were both higher according to extent of metastatic disease (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively).ConclusionsMore skeletal metastases were detected with PSMA PET/CT than WBBS, resulting in a higher upstaging rate mostly in high‐risk patients. The SUVmax of the primary tumour and metastases was associated with upstaging.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3