Patient‐controlled use of nonphysician providers: Appointment scheduling in mixed‐provider settings

Author:

Taiwo Enayon Sunday1ORCID,Savin Sergei2ORCID,Chen (Frank) Yuohua3ORCID,Chin Kwai‐Sang3

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Business and Economics The University of Winnipeg Winnipeg Manitoba Canada

2. The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

3. College of Business City University of Hong Kong Kowloon Hong Kong

Abstract

AbstractThe aging population and increasing chronic disease load are rapidly changing the face of primary care delivery, with mid‐level (e.g., nurse) practitioners providing growing proportion of patient care. Potential differences in the quality of care offered by physicians and nurse practitioners may affect patient preferences, thus leading to patient choice behavior. This paper focuses on the problem of appointment scheduling for physician–nurse teams in the presence of patient choice and no‐shows. We propose a novel model that accounts for patient choices in a system with two provider types. Despite the increased structural complexity of the model, we derive sufficient conditions under which the problem is efficiently solvable. To counter the computational challenges arising in the general setting, we propose an easy‐to‐implement heuristic, which is proven to be optimal in the absence of patient no‐shows. Our numerical study shows how the ratio of qualities of care delivered by nurses and physicians affect the profitability of the medical practice, enabling the analysis of the trade‐offs involved in hiring a nurse practitioner. This paper introduces a patient‐controlled approach to incorporating nonphysician providers into physician‐led outpatient care delivery systems and compares it to widely used “ice breaker” and “standalone” modes of using nonphysician providers. Our findings reveal that clinical practices that employ mixed (physicians and nonphysicians) provider pools can significantly improve their financial and operational performance by moving away from the “ice breaker” and “standalone” use of nonphysician providers by delaying the selection of an appropriate care provider till the actual day of care delivery.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Management Science and Operations Research

Reference40 articles.

1. AAMC. (2019).New findings confirm predictions on physician shortage.Association of American Medical Colleges.https://www.aamc.org/news‐insights/press‐releases/new‐findings‐confirm‐predictions‐physician‐shortage

2. Managing Patient Panels with Non‐Physician Providers

3. Carroll A. E.(2016 November 8).A doctor shortage? Let's take a closer look.The New York Times.https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/08/upshot/a‐doctor‐shortage‐lets‐take‐a‐closer‐look.html

4. Payment Regulations for Advanced Practice Nurses: Implications for Primary Care

5. Sequencing and Scheduling Appointments with Potential Call-In Patients

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Scheduling in services: a review and bibliometric analysis;Operations Management Research;2024-03-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3