A machine learning approach to deal with ambiguity in the humanitarian decision‐making

Author:

Grass Emilia1ORCID,Ortmann Janosch2,Balcik Burcu3ORCID,Rei Walter4

Affiliation:

1. Business School University of Mannheim Mannheim Germany

2. GERAD, CRM, and Department of Analytics, Operations and IT Université du Québec á Montréal Montréal Quebec Canada

3. Industrial Engineering Department Ozyegin University Istanbul Turkey

4. CIRRELT, and Department of Analytics, Operations and IT Université du Québec á Montréal Montréal Quebec Canada

Abstract

AbstractOne of the major challenges for humanitarian organizations in response planning is dealing with the inherent ambiguity and uncertainty in disaster situations. The available information that comes from different sources in postdisaster settings may involve missing elements and inconsistencies, which can hamper effective humanitarian decision‐making. In this paper, we propose a new methodological framework based on graph clustering and stochastic optimization to support humanitarian decision‐makers in analyzing the implications of divergent estimates from multiple data sources on final decisions and efficiently integrating these estimates into decision‐making. To the best of our knowledge, the integration of ambiguous information into decision‐making by combining a cluster machine learning method with stochastic optimization has not been done before. We illustrate the proposed approach on a realistic case study that focuses on locating shelters to serve internally displaced people (IDP) in a conflict setting, specifically, the Syrian civil war. We use the needs assessment data from two different reliable sources to estimate the shelter needs in Idleb, a district of Syria. The analysis of data provided by two assessment sources has indicated a high degree of ambiguity due to inconsistent estimates. We apply the proposed methodology to integrate divergent estimates in making shelter location decisions. The results highlight that our methodology leads to higher satisfaction of demand for shelters than other approaches such as a classical stochastic programming model. Moreover, we show that our solution integrates information coming from both sources more efficiently thereby hedging against the ambiguity more effectively. With the newly proposed methodology, the decision‐maker is able to analyze the degree of ambiguity in the data and the degree of consensus between different data sources to ultimately make better decisions for delivering humanitarian aid.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Management Science and Operations Research

Reference74 articles.

1. Experienced vs. Described Uncertainty: Do We Need Two Prospect Theory Specifications?

2. Abuoda G. Hendrix C. &Campo S.(2021).Automatic tag recommendation for the UN Humanitarian Data Exchange.BIRDS+ WEPIR@ CHIIR 4–10.

3. ACAPS. (2014).Idleb–governorate profile–Syria needs analysis project.https://reliefweb.int/report/syrian‐arab‐republic/idleb‐governorate‐profile‐syria‐needs‐analysis‐project‐june‐2014

4. Challenges in humanitarian information management and exchange: evidence from Haiti

5. Andres J. Wolf C. T. Cabrero Barros S. Oduor E. Nair R. Kjærum A. Tharsgaard A. B. &Madsen B. S.(2020).Scenario‐based XAI for humanitarian aid forecasting. InExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(pp.1–8).Association for Computing Machinery.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3