Evaluating the “return on patient engagement initiatives” in medicines research and development: A literature review-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Evaluating the “return on patient engagement initiatives” in medicines research and development: A literature review

Published:2019-09-06 Issue:1 Volume:23 Page:5-18
ISSN:1369-6513
Container-title:Health Expectations
language:en
Short-container-title:Health Expect

Author:

Vat Lidewij Eva¹^ORCID,Finlay Teresa²^ORCID,Jan Schuitmaker‐Warnaar Tjerk¹^ORCID,Fahy Nick²^ORCID,Robinson Paul³,Boudes Mathieu⁴,Diaz Ana⁵,Ferrer Elisa⁶,Hivert Virginie⁶,Purman Gabor⁷,Kürzinger Marie‐Laure⁸^ORCID,Kroes Robert A.⁹,Hey Claudia¹⁰,Broerse Jacqueline E.W.¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Athena Institute Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

2. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK

3. MSD (Merck Sharp & Dohme) London UK

4. European Patients' Forum (EPF) Brussels Belgium

5. Alzheimer Europe Luxembourg Luxembourg

6. EURORDIS – Rare Diseases Europe Paris France

7. Nexgen Healthcare Communications London UK

8. Sanofi Chilly-Mazarin France

9. Lilly Nederland BV Utrecht The Netherlands

10. Merck Healthcare KGaA Darmstadt Germany

Funder

Innovative Medicines Initiative

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/hex.12951

Reference97 articles.

1. PARADIGM.Patients active in research and dialogues for an improved generation of medicines. PARADIGM.https://imi-paradigm.eu/our-work/. Published 2018. Accessed October 6 2019.

2. Assessing the Financial Value of Patient Engagement: A Quantitative Approach from CTTI’s Patient Groups and Clinical Trials Project

3. Improving patient involvement in medicines research and development: a practical roadmap;Geissler J;Ther Innov Regul Sci,2017

4. Patient engagement: What partnering with patient in research is all about

5. Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study

Cited by 82 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Patient engagement as a collaborative process in a large Dutch COVID-19 vaccination study (RECOVAC) – insight into the contribution of patient engagement and learnings for the future;Research Involvement and Engagement;2024-09-13

2. Evaluation of research co-design in health: a systematic overview of reviews and development of a framework;Implementation Science;2024-09-11

3. An auto-ethnographic study of co-produced health research in a patient organisation: unpacking the good, the bad, and the unspoken;Research Involvement and Engagement;2024-07-23

4. Critical reflection in team‐based practice: A narrative review;Medical Education;2024-07-07

5. Co-designing a participatory evaluation of older adult partner engagement in the mcmaster collaborative for health and aging;Research Involvement and Engagement;2024-06-11