Affiliation:
1. Department of Learning Health Sciences University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA
2. School of Information University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA
3. Department of Psychiatry University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA
4. Department of Internal Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA
5. Department of Surgery University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA
6. Department of Neurology University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundPreoperative risky alcohol use is one of the most common surgical risk factors. Accurate and early identification of risky alcohol use could enhance surgical safety. Artificial Intelligence‐based approaches, such as natural language processing (NLP), provide an innovative method to identify alcohol‐related risks from patients' electronic health records (EHR) before surgery.MethodsClinical notes (n = 53,629) from pre‐operative patients in a tertiary care facility were analyzed for evidence of risky alcohol use and alcohol use disorder. One hundred of these records were reviewed by experts and labeled for comparison. A rule‐based NLP model was built, and we assessed the clinical notes for the entire population. Additionally, we assessed each record for the presence or absence of alcohol‐related International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnosis codes as an additional comparator.ResultsNLP correctly identified 87% of the human‐labeled patients classified with risky alcohol use. In contrast, diagnosis codes alone correctly identified only 29% of these patients. In terms of specificity, NLP correctly identified 84% of the non‐risky cohort, while diagnosis codes correctly identified 90% of this cohort. In the analysis of the full dataset, the NLP‐based approach identified three times more patients with risky alcohol use than ICD codes.ConclusionsNLP, an artificial intelligence‐based approach, efficiently and accurately identifies alcohol‐related risk in patients' EHRs. This approach could supplement other alcohol screening tools to identify patients in need of intervention, treatment, and/or postoperative withdrawal prophylaxis. Alcohol‐related ICD diagnosis had limited utility relative to NLP, which extracts richer information within clinical notes to classify patients.
Funder
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism