Affiliation:
1. Department of Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry Srinakharinwirot University Bangkok Thailand
2. Department of Microbiology and Center of Excellence on Oral Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Dentistry Chulalongkorn University Bangkok Thailand
3. Research Laboratory of Biotechnology Chulabhorn Research Institute Bangkok Thailand
Abstract
AbstractObjectivesRadiation‐induced dry mouth negatively impacts patients' oral health and quality of life. Currently, evidence‐based recommendation for non‐pharmacologic interventions is still lacking.This study aimed to systematically review clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of non‐pharmacologic interventions in cancer patients with radiation‐induced dry mouth.MethodsRandomized controlled trials from 2000 were searched from 4 databases, including MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase via OVID, and SCOPUS, up to December 16th, 2022 (PROSPERO registration CRD42022378405). The risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool.ResultsTwenty‐one studies were included: 11 on artificial saliva, 4 on electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), 2 on acupuncture, and one study each on low‐level laser therapy, stem cells, chewing gum, and probiotics. Overall bias was low, medium, and high in 33%, 48%, and 19% of the studies, respectively. Certain artificial saliva products and TENS were shown to improve dry mouth symptoms and salivary flow rate (SFR). One study showed that stem cell transplantation significantly increased SFR.ConclusionsThe evidence suggested that certain artificial saliva products and TENS are promising management. However, the evidence was still limited due to heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measurements. Thus, future studies using standard measurements and long‐term follow‐up are warranted.
Funder
Srinakharinwirot University
Subject
General Dentistry,Otorhinolaryngology
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献